animusmods: (Default)
Animus Moderators ([personal profile] animusmods) wrote2012-01-07 02:13 am

Moderator Contact


Mel [EST]
Head Moderator
Tasks: applications, plot, NPCs, activity check, calendar
Journal: [personal profile] maiiau
Plurk: [plurk.com profile] maiiau
AIM: ninthbluestar

Cee [EST]
Moderator
Tasks: applications, plot, NPCs
Journal: [personal profile] narcolepcee
Plurk: [plurk.com profile] ceesawaseesaw
AIM: ceexdoll

Plus [CST]
Moderator
Tasks: applications, lists, plot, NPCs
Journal: [personal profile] plusone
Plurk: [plurk.com profile] oleseiyah
AIM: plusanagi

Britt [PST]
Moderator
Tasks: applications, plot, NPCs
Journal: [personal profile] sugarrushing
Plurk: [plurk.com profile] sugarrushing
AIM: xxametza

Moderator Plurk: [plurk.com profile] towerofanimus
Please do not ping or private plurk the moderator account, as we don't check it as often as we check our regular plurks. You are allowed to private plurk/ping the moderators.

You may also reply to this post if you are in need of mod assistance, wish to bring something to our attention, or have some other mod thing you want to bring up. This is also the place to go to tell us ways we could improve the game or our modding style. Comments are screened, anon is enabled, and IP logging is only on for anonymous comments, which means all we can do is tell how often any one person is commenting, and cannot connect it to any specific journal.

(Anonymous) 2012-04-13 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
Hello there! I've noticed that you currently allow one AU and one OU or two AUs, and while I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with that rule, it does feel like it could lead to some conflicts. Like, for example, suppose two AU slots are taken for a popular canon character. This would prevent an OU castmate from apping into the game, which would be really unfortunate, even if it's not too likely to occur.

I almost wonder if it would make more sense two still allow the two AU slots but also keep an OU slot open for apps no matter what. While this would mean an additional version of a character allowed, it would guarantee that a canon version of popular characters could still app in, even if two AUs joined the game. Plus, it would free up additional slots in some casts which could allow for some interesting scenarios in-game.

(Anonymous) 2012-04-14 08:43 am (UTC)(link)
I guess what I don't quite understand is why it's set up so an OU can be potentially blocked from apping. I definitely understand that there is that potential for casts to grow ridiculously huge (Homestuck in particular), but I don't think it would ever get to a point where one cast would monopolize the entire game. Even with the huge casts, I do see a lot of panfandom interaction.

That being said, I do think it's a better rule than putting a limit on the number of characters per cast because that could also potentially block interested players who might have awesome characters they would like to add to the game.
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)